Re: performance considerations with IO schedulers and DM multipathing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Paul,

the device-mapper target itself doe not use any queue and so there is no scheduler used at all. Only the real devices that are used as paths will be using a scheduler. Whether there might be a performance gain by changing these, I do not know.

Stefan

2007/11/27, Paul Cote <paul.cote@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,
 
Is there any advantage to one specific IO scheduler (below) that may improve IO performance / throughput when running with a round-robin failover policy? Has anyone done testing with this ... and willing to share results?
 
thanks,
Paul
 
  • Completely Fair Queuing—elevator=cfq (default)
  • Deadline—elevator=deadline
  • NOOP—elevator=noop
  • Anticipatory—elevator=as
  •  


    --
    dm-devel mailing list
    dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

    --
    dm-devel mailing list
    dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
    https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

    [Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

      Powered by Linux