the device-mapper target itself doe not use any queue and so there is no scheduler used at all. Only the real devices that are used as paths will be using a scheduler. Whether there might be a performance gain by changing these, I do not know.
Stefan
2007/11/27, Paul Cote <paul.cote@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,Is there any advantage to one specific IO scheduler (below) that may improve IO performance / throughput when running with a round-robin failover policy? Has anyone done testing with this ... and willing to share results?thanks,PaulCompletely Fair Queuing—elevator=cfq (default) Deadline—elevator=deadline NOOP—elevator=noop Anticipatory—elevator=as
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
-- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
