failover vs multibus

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Re: default_path_grouping_policy in multipath.conf

failover = 1 path per priority group
multibus = all valid paths in 1 priority group

Does this mean that if I'm using failover I'm not going to get
multiple path throughput?  And, on the flip side, if I'm sending data
through multiple paths I'm not going to get failover support?
Obviously I want to have both (or all) channels sending traffic, but
still being able to failover in the event I lose a path.  Maybe this
means my multipath.conf is going to get more complex than the standard
configuration sample?

Thanks,
Scott

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux