On Tue, 2007-11-20 at 12:15 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote: > * S. J. van Harmelen > > > I guess I don't have to do that as I compiled the multipath-tools > > myself? > > Then you should have the debugging symbols in place, yes. > > > I did compile them when running the 2.6.22.2 kernel though. Should I > > recompile them when running the 2.6.23.1 kernel, or doesn't that > > matter? > > Doesn't matter. > > > Oke, the segfault happens right at the start (and only at the start), > > so that shouldn't be a problem. But I have to stop the running > > mulipathd and that seems like a problem. This machine is running in > > production :) > > > > So that will have to wait until I get a maintance window I guess... > > Stopping multipathd isn't problematic. It is only responsible for > periodically testing paths to pre-emptively fail non-active paths or > re-instate paths that has been failed by the kernel's dm-multipath layer. > > If everything is running stable with all paths alive and well, > restarting multipathd is nothing to worry about. Oeps... How stupid of me! I'm running the 2.6.22.2 kernel now, so I will have to reboot to get kernel 2.6.23.1 running. So I will have to wait a few days for this... Thanks again :) > > Regards -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
