|
not much difference with
2.6.23.1:
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: kobject_add
failed for 1:0:1:0 with -EEXIST, don't try to register things with
the same
name in the same directory.
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel:
[<c03074d5>] kobject_shadow_add+0x115/0x1b0
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m
kernel: [<c03a8f58>] device_add+0xa8/0x5a0
Oct 17 22:33:56
SANfile_m kernel: [<c02fc582>]
__blk_queue_init_tags+0x32/0x70
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel:
[<c03fb8af>] scsi_sysfs_add_sdev+0x4f/0x220
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m
kernel: [<f99498b7>] qla2xxx_slave_configure+0x77/0x110
[qla2xxx]
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: [<c03f986a>]
scsi_probe_and_add_lun+0x92a/0x950
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel:
[<c03fa26d>] __scsi_scan_target+0x4fd/0x5b0
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m
kernel: [<c03fa954>] scsi_scan_target+0x94/0xc0
Oct 17 22:33:56
SANfile_m kernel: [<c04014f0>] fc_scsi_scan_rport+0x0/0x90
Oct 17
22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: [<c0401568>]
fc_scsi_scan_rport+0x78/0x90
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel:
[<c013e963>] run_workqueue+0x73/0x100
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m
kernel: [<c0142350>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
Oct 17
22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: [<c013f3dc>]
worker_thread+0x9c/0x100
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel:
[<c0142350>] autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x50
Oct 17 22:33:56
SANfile_m kernel: [<c013f340>] worker_thread+0x0/0x100
Oct 17
22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: [<c0142082>] kthread+0x42/0x70
Oct 17
22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: [<c0142040>] kthread+0x0/0x70
Oct 17
22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: [<c0105e6f>]
kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x18
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel:
=======================
Oct 17 22:33:56 SANfile_m kernel: error
1
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 6:01
PM
Subject: Re: multibus /
failover and EMC CX600
* Gerald Nowitzky
> The mpath_prio_emc with
group_by_prio did the trick. Thanks!
>
> But I am still
loosing the paths to the failed devices. I Increased
> dev_loss_tmo, but
the maximum seems to be about 600 - thus, after 10
> Minutes, the paths
fail:
The maximum is indeed 600 seconds in 2.6.23.
>
SANfile_m linux # multipath -l
> hcfshare
(360060160c820080063502869e459dc11) dm-0 ,
> [size=3.4T][features=1
queue_if_no_path][hwhandler=1 emc]
> \_ round-robin 0
[prio=0][enabled]
> \_ #:#:#:# - #:#
[failed][undef]
> \_ #:#:#:# - #:#
[failed][undef]
> \_ round-robin 0 [prio=0][active]
> \_
2:0:0:0 sdd 8:48 [active][undef]
> \_ 1:0:0:0 sdb 8:16
[active][undef]
> If I put them online again, I run into the -EEXIST
prob. Async SCSI
> scanning *is* off in my kernel, so the only thing I
could do from
> here is to try the patch, is it?
Matthew Wilcox'
patch solved this particular problem for me, yes. I
still had some
problems with -EEXIST when unloading and re-inserting the
HBA driver
module, though, but that's a corner case I rarely run into
(as well as
being easily worked around by trying again).
Come to think of it, you
never said which kernel version you're running...?
> Oct 17 17:26:36
SANfile_m kernel: kobject_add failed for 1:0:1:0 with
> -EEXIST, don't
try to register things with the same name in the same
>
directory.
One suggestion... If the sysfs object is still around,
you might be
able to delete it manually by running «echo 1
>
/sys/class/scsi_device/1:0:1:0/device/delete». If that works,
you can
try to rescan again by doing «echo 0 1 0
>
/sys/class/scsi_host/host1/scan». With some luck it'll
work...
If it does, most of the time udev will notice and alert
multipath to
check out the new device. Sometimes it doesn't work,
though - simply
run the «multipath» command manually in that
case.
By the way - the «1» in «host1» maps to the first digit in
«1:0:1:0»,
while the «0 1 0» in the echo command to the last
three.
Regards
--
Tore Anderson
--
dm-devel mailing
list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
|
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
