Hi Benny, Thank you for the comments. On Wed, 05 Sep 2007 10:45:54 +0300, Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 01 2007 at 1:42 +0300, Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > arch/arm/plat-omap/mailbox.c | 9 ++++++--- > > arch/um/drivers/ubd_kern.c | 10 +--------- > > block/elevator.c | 4 ++-- > > block/ll_rw_blk.c | 15 +++++---------- > > drivers/block/DAC960.c | 6 ++---- > > drivers/block/floppy.c | 8 +++----- > > drivers/block/lguest_blk.c | 5 +---- > > drivers/block/nbd.c | 4 +--- > > drivers/block/ps3disk.c | 6 +----- > > drivers/block/sunvdc.c | 5 +---- > > drivers/block/sx8.c | 4 +--- > > drivers/block/ub.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/block/viodasd.c | 5 +---- > > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 5 ++--- > > drivers/cdrom/viocd.c | 5 +---- > > drivers/ide/ide-cd.c | 6 +++--- > > drivers/ide/ide-io.c | 22 +++++++--------------- > > drivers/message/i2o/i2o_block.c | 8 ++------ > > drivers/mmc/card/block.c | 24 +++++------------------- > > drivers/mmc/card/queue.c | 4 ++-- > > drivers/s390/block/dasd.c | 4 +--- > > drivers/s390/char/tape_block.c | 3 +-- > > drivers/scsi/ide-scsi.c | 8 ++++---- > > drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c | 13 ++----------- > > 24 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 130 deletions(-) > > Please Separate this patch to at least three patches. > 1. Block layer - block/elevator.c block/ll_rw_blk.c > 2. SCSI-ML - drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c > 3. Normal drivers, can also be separated into logical > groups like scsi/block etc.. > > This is because these patches introduce conflicts > to lots of queued work I have, and if you separate > them it will help me with my giting. Also I think > that this is logical. Block-layer and scsi_lib are > not drivers, the Subject of the patch does not match. I see. OK, I will separate this patch for each driver so that driver maintainers and developers can apply them easily. Thanks, Kiyoshi Ueda -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
