Mike Christie wrote:
Mike Christie wrote:
And dm-emc.c should probably be changed,
Oops scratch that. I am not sure. I think we talked about that and I was
not sure if there was going to be some userspcae bits like initrd tools
that might be looking for dm-emc instead of dm-mpath-emc. And well, I
was not sure if having dm-rdac be named dm-mpath-rdac might break tools
too, but I guess Alasdair was convinced it would be ok or he would not
have asked for the change.
Actually scrach that :) we should change dm-emc.c since we make the
module name like the old style. I was thinking about some of the other
alternatives that were brought up.
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
