Hi Alasdair, I also read in the definition of DM_DEV_CREATE that the uuid is optional. Since that is the case shouldn't the failure for not having a uuid in "_alloc_thread_status()" be taken out? Thank you, Brian Wood Intel Corporation Digital Enterprise Group Manageability & Platform Software Division brian.j.wood@xxxxxxxxx >-----Original Message----- >From: dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx [mailto:dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx] On >Behalf Of Alasdair G Kergon >Sent: Friday, July 20, 2007 9:26 AM >To: device-mapper development >Subject: Re: Question about dmevents > >See http://people.redhat.com/agk/talks/FOSDEM_2005/text41.html for info >about >how devices are referenced. > >Alasdair >-- >agk@xxxxxxxxxx > >-- >dm-devel mailing list >dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx >https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
