Re: [RFD] BIO_RW_BARRIER - what it means for devices, filesystems, and dm/md.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Neil Brown writes:
 > 

[...]

 > Thus the general sequence might be:
 > 
 >   a/ issue all "preceding writes".
 >   b/ issue the commit write with BIO_RW_BARRIER
 >   c/ wait for the commit to complete.
 >          If it was successful - done.
 >          If it failed other than with EOPNOTSUPP, abort
 >          else continue
 >   d/ wait for all 'preceding writes' to complete
 >   e/ call blkdev_issue_flush
 >   f/ issue commit write without BIO_RW_BARRIER
 >   g/ wait for commit write to complete
 >        if it failed, abort
 >   h/ call blkdev_issue
 >   DONE
 > 
 > steps b and c can be left out if it is known that the device does not
 > support barriers.  The only way to discover this to try and see if it
 > fails.
 > 
 > I don't think any filesystem follows all these steps.

It seems that steps b/ -- h/ are quite generic, and can be implemented
once in a generic code (with some synchronization mechanism like
wait-queue at d/).

Nikita.

[...]

 > 
 > Thank you for your attention.
 > 
 > NeilBrown
 > 

Nikita.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux