Dave Wysochanski wrote: > +#include <scsi/scsi.h> > +#include <scsi/scsi_cmnd.h> > +#include <scsi/scsi_dbg.h> > +#include <scsi/scsi_device.h> > +#include <scsi/scsi_host.h> > +#include <scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h> > +#include <linux/list.h> > +#include <linux/types.h> you should do linux includes then scsi ones. Do you even need the fc, host or cmnd includes? > + > +#include "dm.h" > +#include "dm-hw-handler.h" > + > +#define DM_MSG_PREFIX "multipath hp" > + > +struct hp_sw_context { > + unsigned char sense[SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE]; > +}; > + > + > +/** > + * hp_sw_end_io - Completion handler for HP path activation. > + * @req: failover request > + * @error: scsi-ml error > + * > + * Check sense data, free request structure, and notify dm that > + * pg initialization has completed. > + * > + * Context: scsi-ml softirq > + * > + * Possible optimizations > + * 1. Actually check sense data for retryable error (e.g. NOT_READY) > + */ > +static void hp_sw_end_io(struct request *req, int error) > +{ > + struct dm_path *path = req->end_io_data; > + unsigned err_flags; > + > + if (!error) { > + err_flags = 0; > + DMDEBUG("hp_sw: path activation command on %s - success", > + path->dev->name); > + } > + else { else should be on the same line as "{" I also think we should handle the NOT_READY case that was reported before. > + DMWARN("hp_sw: path activation command on %s - error=0x%x", > + path->dev->name, error); > + err_flags = MP_FAIL_PATH; > + } > + > + req->end_io_data = NULL; > + __blk_put_request(req->q, req); > + dm_pg_init_complete(path, err_flags); > +} > + > +/** > + * hp_sw_get_request - Allocate an HP specific path activation request > + * @path: path on which request will be sent (needed for request queue) > + * > + * The START command is used for path activation request. > + * These arrays are controller-based failover, not LUN based. > + * One START command issued to a single path will fail over all > + * LUNs for the same controller. > + * > + * Possible optimizations > + * 1. Make timeout configurable > + * 2. Preallocate request > + */ > +static struct request *hp_sw_get_request(struct dm_path *path) > +{ > + struct request *req=NULL; > + struct block_device *bdev = path->dev->bdev; > + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev); > + struct hp_sw_context *h = path->hwhcontext; > + > + req = blk_get_request(q, WRITE, GFP_ATOMIC); > + if (req == NULL) > + goto exit; > + > + req->timeout = 60*HZ; > + > + req->errors = 0; > + req->cmd_type = REQ_TYPE_BLOCK_PC; > + req->cmd_flags |= REQ_FAILFAST | REQ_NOMERGE; > + req->end_io = hp_sw_end_io; > + req->end_io_data = path; > + req->sense = h->sense; > + memset(req->sense, 0, SCSI_SENSE_BUFFERSIZE); > + > + memset(&req->cmd, 0, BLK_MAX_CDB); > + req->cmd[0] = START_STOP; > + req->cmd[4] = 1; > + req->cmd_len = COMMAND_SIZE(req->cmd[0]); > +exit: > + return req; > +} > + > +/** > + * hp_sw_pg_init - HP path activation implementation. > + * @hwh: hardware handler specific data > + * @bypassed: unused; is the path group bypassed? (see dm-mpath.c) > + * @path: path to send initialization command > + * > + * Send an HP-specific path activation command on 'path'. > + * Do not try to optimize in any way, just send the activation command. > + * More than one path activation command may be sent to the same controller. > + * This seems to work fine for basic failover support. > + * > + * Possible optimizations > + * 1. Detect an in-progress activation request and avoid submitting another one > + * 2. Model the controller and only send a single activation request at a time > + * 3. Determine the state of a path before sending an activation request > + * > + * Context: kmpathd (see process_queued_ios() in dm-mpath.c) > + */ > +static void hp_sw_pg_init(struct hw_handler *hwh, unsigned bypassed, > + struct dm_path *path) > +{ > + struct request *req; > + struct hp_sw_context *h; > + unsigned err_flags; > + > + path->hwhcontext = hwh->context; > + h = (struct hp_sw_context *) hwh->context; > + you do not need the case do you? -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel