Cool, Thanks. chandra On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 00:06 +0100, Christophe Varoqui wrote: > Le mercredi 21 mars 2007 à 11:38 -0800, Chandra Seetharaman a écrit : > > Hi All, > > > > While working on lsi-rdac hardware handler, I found that the checkers "tur" > > and "readsector0" are not serving the lsi-rdac properly. Also, the storage > > device has a active/passive state which need to be handled properly. > > > > So, I wrote a new path checker for lsi-rdac, to use the C4 inquiry page to get > > the current owner of the lun and set the state as UP(active) or GHOST(passive). > > Changes are in patch 1/3. > > > > After applying the above patch, I realized the priorities are not set properly. > > Made some changes to use the GHOST state while setting priorities. Changes are > > in patch 2/3. > > > > Debugging the above patches found that the wait time (5 seconds) in multipathd > > was not sufficient for the devices to appear in /dev/ It was taking about 20 > > seconds. Changed the wait time to be 60 seconds. Change in patch 3/3. > > > > Please provide me with your feedback/comment on these changes regarding > > correctness, completeness etc., > > > Looks very good. I merged the 3 patches. > > In 1/3, I changed the DEF_TIMEOUT name to avoid surcharging the one in > checker.h > > I'm having a hard time push to kernel.org, so don't expect to see the > git tree updated soon. > > Thanks, > cvaroqui > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - sekharan@xxxxxxxxxx | .......you may get it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel