* Clemens Fruhwirth <clemens@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2007-01-03 20:32]: > > I just applied the two patches from that thread and successfully ran > > 'cryptsetup luksClose' on ARM. > > "cryptsetup luksClose" is just an alias for "cryptsetup remove". This > should never fail. What's with luksOpen after the patches? Sorry, I meant to say that luksOpen worked with the patches. I simply copy&pasted the wrong line. > > Would the lack of __flush_anon_page() on ARM explain the corruption > > you've observed? > Again, I'm not familiar with this. Well, it seems to fix the problem and according to the thread on lkml the lack of flush_anon_page() on ARM is associated with some corruption. At least FUSE doesn't work on ARM without those patches, so it seems likely that luksOpen is also affected. -- Martin Michlmayr http://www.cyrius.com/ -- dm-devel mailing list dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
