Re: Re: device mapper integrated loops - and one more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bryn,

Yes, dm-loop will support as many loop devices as device-mapper can allow.

fine. i assume this is >>256  !?  :)

The changes dm-loop requires in device-mapper core are pretty minor and
have already been merged in 2.6.19, so it's just the dm-loop patch
itself remaining.

ok, thanks

This should work fine - there are a couple of known issues with the
existing patch, but unless you are using large images (>2G), or have a
severely fragmented filesystem you shouldn't run into these.

i have several iso images of dvd-roms on my server which i`d like to mount loopback.
they are >2gb, so i think i wait for the fix.

I'll see if we can get a revised version of the current patch for wider
testing in the next couple of weeks - let me know if you would be
interested in trying this out.

yes indeed, that would be nice! if it isn´t any additional effort for you, please let me know since i`m not on this list (too much mail, anyway) i can offer testing dm-loop with a very large number (>200) of cd-rom/dvd-images.

roland







Subject:    Re:  Re: device mapper integrated loops - and one more
From:       "Bryn M. Reeves" <breeves () redhat ! com>
Date:       2006-11-21 21:11:37
Message-ID: 45636B89.7080407 () redhat ! com
[Download message RAW]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

devzero@xxxxxx wrote:
Hello !

after desparately seeking for a solution to have more than 256 loop
devices (for a huge cd-rom server), i have recently come across
dm-loop, which looks very promising (to replace loop.c)

can i have more than 256 devices which this?

Hi Roland,

Yes, dm-loop will support as many loop devices as device-mapper can allow.

our cd-rom server is going to have more than 256 iso-images soon and
i need to upgrade to a more recent OS, anyway, so this won`t be a
problem that dm-loop is so brand new.

but - any timeline for dm-loop mainline inclusion ?

should i wait for 2.6.19 or 2.6.20 ?

There isn't a fixed timeline. We are currently working to improve the
lookup code - the prototype patch uses a linear search which doesn't
scale well for large/fragmented image files. I have some tests running
at the moment and we hope to have something soon - the results so far
are good, it's just a case of selecting between a couple of different
methods.

The changes dm-loop requires in device-mapper core are pretty minor and
have already been merged in 2.6.19, so it's just the dm-loop patch
itself remaining.

is it already useable with less recent kernels, i.e. can i download
dm-loop patch and recent dmsetup tool and use with older kernel ?

This should work fine - there are a couple of known issues with the
existing patch, but unless you are using large images (>2G), or have a
severely fragmented filesystem you shouldn't run into these.

I'll see if we can get a revised version of the current patch for wider
testing in the next couple of weeks - let me know if you would be
interested in trying this out.

Thanks,

Bryn.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFY2uJ6YSQoMYUY94RArTwAJwMmCJbTajxmX6Q/ps545zbgvJJOACg28NP
A+F6CtqcHH0fOG9lq2XQw/8=
=CzES
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux