RE: patch to discovery.c to stillgetpathpriorityforpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: patch to discovery.c to stillgetpathpriorityforpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN
From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 22:06:57 +0100
Cc: dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx, dave.wysochanski@xxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6CCEAEDF4D06984A83F427424F47D6E4013D155C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <6CCEAEDF4D06984A83F427424F47D6E4013D155C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>

> 
> I tested with inactive snapshots and just have one minor (but important)
> adjustment to what is in source control at the moment.
> 
Shame on me.
Applied.

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

References:
- RE: patch to discovery.c to stillgetpathpriorityforpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN
  - From: Edward Goggin

Prev by Date: Re: 2.6.19-rc6 -- dm: possible recursive locking detected
Next by Date: Re: Problem booting linux 2.6.19-rc5, 2.6.19-rc5-git6, 2.6.19-rc5-mm2 with md raid 1 over lvm root
Previous by thread: RE: patch to discovery.c to stillgetpathpriorityforpaths with path state of PATH_DOWN
Next by thread: patch to CLARiiON path checker to handle inactive snapshhots
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux