Re: [RFC] DM Snapshot scalability - Common snap store approach

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/9/06, Vijai Babu Madhavan <MVijai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Quick summary
=========

Various approaches that are being considered/prototyped to solve the
scalability problem with
DM snapshots are described here. Currently, I like the 2.d approach
(using a single cow device
for all snapshots of an origin, with a combination of exception
stores). If you don't want to
read about other approaches, jump there directly. I would like to know
about other ways
to solve this problem, and comments about these approaches.

A shared exception store was included as part of the cluster snapshot
prototype that Daniel Phillips worked on some time ago:
http://sources.redhat.com/cluster/csnap/

See section "1.3  Multiple Snapshots" and "5 Server Implementation
details" in csnap.ps.  And csnap.c in the csnap.0.0.1.tgz

This code is quite cluster oriented but it does provide a good amount
of detail on how one might implement a shared exception store.  I
kernel-based solution could come later...

It would be _very_ nice to improve the current dm-snapshot with shared
exceptions; I for one am eager to see continued
discussion/implementation of this.

Mike

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux