Re: dm-userspace (no in-kernel cache version)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



FT> Have you tried SCHED_FIFO?

Not yet, but that is a good suggestion.

FT> By the way, can you upload or post the latest kernel and
FT> user-space code?

Right now I am working on a version that still uses read()/write(),
but that does not use a remap cache (in a way very similar to what you
posted).  When I get it close to stable, I'll post it here for
comments.

After reviewing the ringbuffer code more, I'm not sure that it really
buys you any additional performance (other than 1/3 less syscalls).
The amount of memory that is copied around seems to be about the
same.  Either way, I'll revisit this after I get my current version
stable again.

-- 
Dan Smith
IBM Linux Technology Center
Open Hypervisor Team
email: danms@xxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: pgplMBeY41K4b.pgp
Description: PGP signature

--
dm-devel mailing list
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux