"Steinar H. Gunderson" <sgunderson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Which kind of implies that we passed a null (or very small small) `struct > > kmem_cache' pointer into kmem_cache_free(). But that doesn't seem like the > > sort of thing which will take hours to reproduce. > > > > Do you have CONFIG_NUMA set? > > Hm, yes, for some reason CONFIG_NUMA, CONFIG_K8_NUMA and > CONFIG_x86_64_ACPI_NUMA are all set; I guess they're left from the stock > config I use at a base. (For those tuning in; this is a dual-core amd64. That > might be relevant somehow.) Please try it without NUMA - we've had a few problems there of late. If that fixes it then I have patches for you to test ;) -- dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
