Rumor has it that on Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 09:36:23AM -0400 Eddie Williams said: > On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 09:24 -0400, Philip R. Auld wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Rumor has it that on Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 11:23:18PM +0200 Christophe Varoqui said: > > > I'm inclined to leave it that way, if not only to discourage people to > > > partition multipathed devices :) > > > > > > > Why do you want to discourage partitioning multipath devices? That > > seems to me to be a requirement. > > It seems to me that volume managers, aka LVM or the like, is where folks > should be heading and the faster we can move them in that direction the > better. The volume managers provide so much more flexibility than > partitions. > Maybe so. But they also add another layer of complexity for booting. I'd like the steps between me and a successful boot to be as complex as required but no more so. Cheers, Phil > Eddie > > -- > > dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel -- Philip R. Auld, Ph.D. Egenera, Inc. Software Architect 165 Forest St. (508) 858-2628 Marlboro, MA 01752 -- dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
