Wysochanski, David wrote:
Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> On mer, 2006-01-18 at 23:29 +0100, Christophe Varoqui wrote:
> > On mer, 2006-01-18 at 16:41 -0500, David Wysochanski wrote:
> > > I'm wondering where the value of 1000 came from, and
> > > whether that's really a good default.
> > >
> > > Some preliminary tests I've run with iSCSI seem to indicate
> > > something lower (say 100) might be a better default, but
> > > perhaps others have a differing opinion. I searched the
> > > list but couldn't find any discussion on it.
> > >
> > I'm not really focused on performance, but this seems to be an
> > io-pattern dependant choice.
> >
> > Higher values may help the elevators, (right ?) thus help the seeky
> > workloads. Lower values may certainly benefit from lower values to
> > really get the paths summed bandwidth.
> >
> > Anyway, I can not back this with numbers. Any value will be fine
with me
> > as a default, and I highlight that now you can also set per device
> > defaults like rr_min_io in hwtable.c
> >
> Replying to myself,
>
> I finally got the chance to challenge my sayings, and I'm proven badly
> wrong :/
>
> On a StorageWorks EVA110 FC array, 2 active 2Gb/s paths to 2 2Gb/s
> target ports. 1 streaming read (sg_dd dio=1 if=/dev/mapper/mpath0
> of=/dev/null bs=1M count=100k) :
>
> rr_min_io = 1000 => aggregated throughput = 120 Mo/s
> rr_min_io = 100 => aggregated throughput = 130 Mo/s
> rr_min_io = 50 => aggregated throughput = 200 Mo/s
> rr_min_io = 20 => aggregated throughput = 260 Mo/s
> rr_min_io = 10 => aggregated throughput = 300 Mo/s
>
What I seemed to see what the larger the I/O size the lower
I needed to go with rr_min_io to get best throughput. Did
you run it with a smaller block size, say 4k?
I will try to get some more definitive #'s and post.
--
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
As promised, here's some data I ran on a netapp filer with iscsi and
dm-multipath with a tool that is similar to iometer (multithreaded
and generates direct IOs, one per thread). In general, I agree
about needing to tune for a given configuration as there's multiple
levels of queuing, and rr_min_io should make sense with all of that,
the workload, etc.
DISCLAIMER: This shouldn't be viewed as official perf numbers for
netapp filers but was just done to tune rr_min_io. Also, the
test had a very small # of disk spindles so don't read too much
into things like low overall throughput on 100% WRITEs.
Initiator:
- rhel4 u3, 2 GigE NICs
Target:
- netapp filer, 2 iSCSI ports
- single lun exported to host via both ports
rr_min_io
I/O size 8 16 32 64 128 256
512 1024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
512byte 9 9 9.6 9.3 9.3 9.7
10 10
4k 53 54 57 58 63 61
58 56
8k 85 85 87 86 85 77
75 73
64k 109 110 111 109 109 94
93 93
256k 134 136 135 134 133 134
135 126
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughput (MB/s) for a given I/O size and rr_min_io value
128 threads, 60/40 read/write, 100% random
rr_min_io
I/O size 8 16 32 64 128 256
512 1024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
512byte 12 12 12 12 11 11
11 11
4k 67 70 69 70 73 75
74 75
8k 107 108 107 109 109 101
90 95
64k 167 168 168 168 168 153
129 120
256k 175 174 175 174 175 177
174 156
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughput (MB/s) for a given I/O size and rr_min_io value
128 threads, 100% read, 100% sequential, 100MB working set (cached reads)
rr_min_io
I/O size 8 16 32 64 128 256
512 1024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
512byte 7.8 8 8 8 9 9
9 9
4k 44 44 44 45 44 41
40 40
8k 65 65 64 63 62 57
55 53
64k 69 70 70 70 69 66
62 58
256k 92 95 93 94 93 94
93 84
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughput (MB/s) for a given I/O size and rr_min_io value
128 threads, 100% write, 100% sequential
rr_min_io
I/O size 8 16 32 64 128 256
512 1024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
512byte 11.5 12 12 11.7 11 11
11 11
4k 66 70 70 71 74 75
73 75
8k 107 108 108 109 109 100
89 95
64k 167 168 169 169 170 154
128 120
256k 172 173 174 171 173 174
168 153
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughput (MB/s) for a given I/O size and rr_min_io value
128 threads, 100% read, 100% random
rr_min_io
I/O size 8 16 32 64 128 256
512 1024
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
512byte 7.6 8 8 8 9 9
8.7 8.5
4k 45 45 45 46 45 42 40 38
8k 66 67 65 65 64 59 55 52
64k 71 71 71 71 70 65 61 58
256k 93 93 95 95 95 94 94 85
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Throughput (MB/s) for a given I/O size and rr_min_io value
128 threads, 100% write, 100% random
--
dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
