> > > > > I'm still strugling to understand what this new mode does. > > If you can help with an example, I'd appreciate :/ > > I'm sorry for the confusion. I was not clear as to the purpose. > The purpose is to only do "automatic" failback when the active path > group was "automatically" changed from the highest priority path > group. > In such a scenario, wouldn't the priorizer catch priority changes ? ie, paths to owning SP are heavier than paths to not owning SP, so changing the owning SP in navisphere would shuffle the path group priorites. If it is the case I would imagine the failback target to be the externally designated one, which seems right. Regards, cvaroqui -- dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel