On jeu, 2006-02-16 at 18:43 -0600, Benjamin Marzinski wrote: > There is some weirdness in the nr_active handling in multipathd, For instance, > whenever you change state to a PATH_DOWN or PATH_SHAKY state, you decrement > the number of active paths, even if you change from PATH_DOWN to PATH_SHAKY. > > The attached patch attempts to fix the problem. It slightly changes how some > of the states are handled. > Applied, though this one shows the code in this area needs more love : it is too hard to read to be honest. Anyway, you sure are right to account the ghost paths in nr_active. BTW, I realize I forgot to credit you (Ben) in the git log. Sorry about that. Regards, cvaroqui -- dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel