Re: [kpartx] Use lseek64 instead of self-defined syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [kpartx] Use lseek64 instead of self-defined syscall
From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2005 23:53:19 +0100
In-reply-to: <4396F5DF.9090105@xxxxxxx>
References: <4396F5DF.9090105@xxxxxxx>
Reply-to: christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx, device-mapper development <dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: dm-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxx

On mer, 2005-12-07 at 15:46 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi Christophe,
> 
> this patch enables kpartx to use lseek64 instead of a self-defined syscall.
> 
Applied, thanks.

--

dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

References:
- [kpartx] Use lseek64 instead of self-defined syscall
  - From: Hannes Reinecke

Prev by Date: Re: [kpartx] add support for S/390 DASD
Next by Date: Re: [kpartx] add support for S/390 DASD
Previous by thread: [kpartx] Use lseek64 instead of self-defined syscall
Next by thread: [multipathd] correct oom_adj value
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [DM Crypt] [Fedora Desktop] [ATA RAID] [Fedora Marketing] [Fedora Packaging] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite Discussion] [KDE Users] [Fedora Docs]

Powered by Linux