On sam, 2005-11-05 at 01:03 +0100, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi, > > > I'm inclined to keep the tools patch anyway : it wastes an "int" per > > multipath but is brain-friendlier (as it avoids using mpp->nextpg to > > represent the current setting *and* the best-rated setting). > > > > Are interested parties ok with that ? > > I'm ok with anything you prefer, as long as it works and it doesn't change > again with the next kernel/tools-release ;) > Want to write a regression test ? Regards, cvaroqui -- dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
