Re: RAID5 support ?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Heinz Mauelshagen wrote:
> FYI: we keep information about which regions (arbitrary sized segments
>      of the address space) of the set are dirty with the the
>      device-mapper dirty-log so that we can resynchonize those at set startup.

Sounds sort of nasty.
What happens if the user boots to Windows in the mean time?
Windows will see corrupted data?

(I mean, that's the whole point of using a hardware soft-RAID
solution, isn't it?  BIOS and multiple-OS support for the metadata
format / RAID arrays?)

--

dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel

[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux