Neil Brown wrote: > On Wednesday September 28, agk@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >>On Wed, Sep 14, 2005 at 02:32:59PM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: >> >>> It is worth noting that the code uses the same bitsets for in-memory >>> and on-disk logs. As these bitsets are host-endian and host-sized, >>> this means that they cannot safely be moved between computers with >>> different architectures. I don't know if the dm doco makes this >>> clear... >> >> >>Are you able to try out the (untested) patch from Patrick below? >>Since the current implementation is broken for 64-bit BE we might >>as well fix both problems at the same time. >> > > > I've ask the person who reported the problem to test this patch. I'll > let you know what eventuates. Thanks > ... it's a pity about the 'ext2' appearing in there instead of a more > sensible 'set_le_bit', isn't it :-( > yes. In some (well, the big-endian) architectures it's called set_le_bit and #defined to ext2_set_bit, bit the LE architectures just define ext2_set_bit to be set_bit :( -- patrick -- dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
