On Tue, Mar 08, 2005 at 04:23:59PM -0500, goggin, edward wrote: > Furthermore, I strongly suspect the panic is related to having > multiple pg_init requests outstanding for the same multipath. It was not the intention to allow concurrent pg_init requests of any sort - but they are indeed not locked out correctly. > (1) It is possible that an outstanding pg_init request and a new one I don't see a need to allow that. Only one priority group is in use at once. Even switch_group has to wait without being able to cancel already-submitted pg_init I/O. Not mea Alasdair -- agk@xxxxxxxxxx
