On 2005-06-14T13:44:34, Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'm sure you understand this patch is rather invasive. I'm clearly
> reluctant to maintain backward compatibility on this point.
>
> Distributors assuming the burden of it is not nice either.
Yes, I looked at how much the code diverged, and got pretty frightened
to be maintaining such a patch.
> Have you pondered backporting the uevent kernel patch : it seems
> rather safe (from my seat, that is :)
That might indeed be the cleanest solution. What exactly is needed for
it to work for multipath-tools?
Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx>
--
High Availability & Clustering
SUSE Labs, Research and Development
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business -- Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
