On dim, 2005-06-12 at 14:21 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 09:34:53PM +0200, christophe varoqui wrote: > > On jeu, 2005-06-09 at 20:15 +0100, Alasdair G Kergon wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2005 at 08:16:42PM +0200, christophe varoqui wrote: > > > > Should we stabilize a 0.4.5 out of the git head > > be aware I broke the StorageWorks failover model to satisfy the > > expressed need to proactively fail paths in the DM when the checkers see > > them going down. > > What does that mean for StorageWorks users? I'm currently setting up a > StorageWorks EVA3000 from scratch based on FC4 final. Will I stumble > into any pitfalls, or would that only affect gits users? > 0.4.4 should be ok. I don't know what FC packagers did though. Also be aware you'll be best served using the failover policy for now : there is a 20% performance impact with multi-path per PG. Regards, -- christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx>