On Sat, 02 Jul 2005 00:07:40 +0200 christophe varoqui <christophe.varoqui@xxxxxxx> wrote > Would printing the "PG-summed path priorities" value for each PG meet > your needs/taste ? Yes. I assume that this would be the sum as recorded by multipathd and the kernel's active path group would only reflect this under certain conditions, (e.g., immediate failback is enabled). What about the idea of having device specific display options (and device specific plug-ins to manage these) which while they are multipathing relevant, they are not managed by multipath(8)? Are you trying to stay away from this? I'm sure our CLARiiON customers would rather see that the multipath display command using terminology which they are familiar with already.
