On 2005-04-27T12:27:32, "goggin, edward" <egoggin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Although I know it sounds a bit radical and counter intuitive, > but I'm not sure of the utility gained in the current multipathing > implementation by multipathd periodically testing paths which > are known to be in an active state in the multipath target driver. > Possibly someone can convince me otherwise. Ed, I misread your mail and missed the point. Your more succinct summary on the conf call today made it all clear to me; indeed this doesn't just need optimization, it needs fixing... https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156280 Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@xxxxxxx> -- High Availability & Clustering SUSE Labs, Research and Development SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - A Novell Business
