Re: [dm-devel] New -udm?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



goggin, edward wrote:

I don't see a way around needing to use pre-allocated bio memory
which is reserved strictly for this purpose -- albeit it is possible
that a single bio could be reserved for making progress in serial
fashion across all multipaths which are in this state.



Hey back on the subject of bio allocations. Is failback going to stay
in userspace? If so, the bio allocation there suffers from the same
problem. Would it work to have a fs_bio_set and block_bio_set so
the allocations coming into the block layer would use the fs set and
everything below (like block/scsi_ioctl or hw handlers) would use the
block layer one (today everyone uses the fs_bio_set which causes problems)?
If you stacked multipath on top of multipath I guess this would not work.
Or will you need per device bio sets?

For sg io there other allocations, so this just handles the bio itself.


[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux