Good, but don't beat too hard ... :) btw, I don't understand the multipathd VSZ allocation (around 85 MB). Selon Joe Thornber <thornber@xxxxxxxxxx>: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 12:11:08AM +0100, christophe varoqui wrote: > > Which leads me to ask : given the current status of the multipath-tools, > > don't you agree that the multipath userspace handling does not belong in > > volume managers like LVM2 or EVMS ? > > Agreed, we're currently planning to put any effort on the userland > side of this into your tools rather than LVM2 - this has been our > thinking for a few months. I will get around to reviewing your code, > I promise. > > - Joe > > -- > > dm-devel@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel > --