On Sat, Nov 29, 2003 at 06:02:10PM +1100, Alec Thomas wrote: > Right, I noticed the status stuff, but there didn't seem to be a > "device-mapper" way to actually communicate with the target once it is > up and running? I guess creating a /proc entry or another device node > specifically for communication is the only way? We are planning to add this in the form of an ioctl that will pass an arbitrary command line to a new target method. - Joe