[dm-devel] Re: what to do with fls(x) (or device-mapper & swsusp-1.x.x ? )

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:31:03PM +0200, Svetoslav Slavtchev wrote:
> Hi ,
> i'm tring to incorporate the dev-mapper 1.00.04 in a kernel that already has
> int fls(int x)
> which conflicts with the definitions in dm-io.[ch] 

There's a bug in that code anyway, I suspect that all of the fls/log2
stuff will be removed eventually.

> so i wanted to ask you whether the attached patch looks OK,

At a glance it looks ok, though it might be simpler if you just
renamed our ffs to dm_ffs.  That way you'd have more confidence that
things works as they do now.

> i wanted also to ask whether there are some important fixes in the patches
> from Joe Thornber,
> which should be applied after device-mapper-1.00.04

My patchsets do have important fixes, but they are also less stable.
CVS gets updated with the patches that have proved themselves.

- Joe



[Index of Archives]     [DM Crypt]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Discussion]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux