On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 07:26:14PM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote: > > On 5/13/21 7:15 AM, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > > On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 06:42:22PM +0900, Changheun Lee wrote: > > >> > > >> Problem might be casued by exhausting of memory. And memory exhausting > > >> would be caused by setting of small bio_max_size. Actually it was not > > >> reproduced in my VM environment at first. But, I reproduced same problem > > >> when bio_max_size is set with 8KB forced. Too many bio allocation would > > >> be occurred by setting of 8KB bio_max_size. > > > > > > Hmm... I'm not sure how to align your diagnosis with the symptoms in > > > the bug report. If we were limited by memory, that should slow down > > > the I/O, but we should still be making forward progress, no? And a > > > forced reboot should not result in data corruption, unless maybe there > > > > If you use data=writeback, data writes and journal writes are not > > synchronized. So, it may be possible that a journal write made it through, > > a data write didn't - the end result would be a file containing random > > contents that was on the disk. > > > > Changheun - do you use data=writeback? Did the corruption happen only in > > newly created files? Or did it corrupt existing files? > > Actually I didn't reproduced data corruption. I only reproduced hang during > making ext4 filesystem. Alex, could you check it? > > > > > > was a missing check for a failed memory allocation, causing data to be > > > written to the wrong location, a missing error check leading to the > > > block or file system layer not noticing that a write had failed > > > (although again, memory exhaustion should not lead to failed writes; > > > it might slow us down, sure, but if writes are being failed, something > > > is Badly Going Wrong --- things like writes to the swap device or > > > writes by the page cleaner must succeed, or else Things Would Go Bad > > > In A Hurry). > > > > Mikulas I've recently been debugging an issue that isn't this exact issue (it occurs in 5.10), but looks somewhat similar. On a host that - Is running a kernel 5.4 >= x >= 5.10.47 at least - Using an EXT4 + LUKS partition - Running Elasticsearch stress tests We see that the index files used by the Elasticsearch process become corrupt after some time, and in each case I've seen so far the content of the file looks like the EXT4 extent header. #define EXT4_EXT_MAGIC cpu_to_le16(0xf30a) For example: $ hexdump -C /hdd1/nodes/0/indices/c6eSGDlCRjaWeIBwdeo9DQ/0/index/_23c.si 00000000 0a f3 04 00 54 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |....T...........| 00000010 00 38 00 00 00 60 46 05 00 38 00 00 00 88 00 00 |.8...`F..8......| 00000020 00 98 46 05 00 40 00 00 00 88 00 00 00 a0 46 05 |..F..@........F.| 00000030 00 48 00 00 00 88 00 00 00 a8 46 05 00 48 00 00 |.H........F..H..| 00000040 00 88 00 00 00 a8 46 05 00 48 00 00 00 88 00 00 |......F..H......| 00000050 00 a8 46 05 00 48 00 00 00 88 00 00 00 a8 46 05 |..F..H........F.| 00000060 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 |................| * 000001a0 00 00 |..| 000001a2 I'm working on tracing exactly when this happens, but I'd be interested to hear if that sounds familar or might have a similar underlying cause beyond the commit that was reverted above. Cheers, Sam Mendoza-Jonas _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list -- dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to dm-crypt-leave@xxxxxxxx
