‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ On Tuesday, May 12, 2020 12:54 PM, Ondrej Kozina <okozina@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > There were basically two reasons for the increase in default LUKS2 > metadata size IIRC: > > 1. As Milan pointed out online reencryption performs much better when > there's enough consecutive free space in LUKS2 keyslots area (the binary > area for keyslots material). > > While testing we figured out with 16 MiB LUKS2 metadata we hit good > balance of getting good enough performance for reencryption and not > consuming too much free space on a drive so that it's not a big issue > for general use case and for users not interested in reencryption. > > To get smaller metadata size you can format the device with: > cryptsetup luksFormat --offset 8192 and data offset (and LUKS2 metadata > size) will be at 4MiB exactly (similar to current LUKS1 default). > > 2. LUKS2 supports up to 32 keyslots. With 4 MiB keyslots area there > were not enough space to fill all keyslots. > > In general I don't think 16MB is big issue nowadays and for special use > cases you can create smaller LUKS2 metadata. Even smaller than LUKS1. > Milan gave example here: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932437#10 > > > So I'd say 16 MiB is indeed recommended default LUKS2 metadata size in > most cases. OK. > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > About extending existing LUKS2 metadata. Technically it's possible, but > currently you have to use reencryption for it since we have to reduce > data device size first before extending LUKS2 metadata. > > cryptsetup reencrypt --reduce-device-size 4M /dev/sdx > > (but do NOT forget to shrink residing filesystem/data first!) > > By reducing data device by 4 MiBs we can extend LUKS2 metadata by same > value. In the process the data are shifted backwards towards tail of the > device. > > In future we may add option to change LUKS2 metadata in-place w/o data > shifting (reencryption) but that would be feature that requires > cooperation with i.e. LVM2 or other volume management tools. If LVM2 > could extends device by adding extents in head of LV, it would be > possible to simplify also online encryption etc. > > Kind regards > O. My question was not how to do it (obviously, one needs to move partition first), but why extra space for header may be needed. Is it for the case where users want (for some reason) often to do reencryption (not just for one time, but periodically)? _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
