Re: unbound keys

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Ondrej,

On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 13:28:45 CEST, Ondrej Kozina wrote:
> Hi Arno,
> 
> and sorry for late reply (see below):
> 
> On 3/31/20 11:21 AM, Arno Wagner wrote:
> >There is also the thing that the FAQ is LUKS1, not LUKS2.
[...]
> >Will existing features be stable after 2.4.0 or do you plan
> >additional changes?
> 
> I'd say LUKS2 on-disk format itself is stable at least since 2.1.0 release.
> 2.2.0 and later we're adding new features but it doesn't mean we can't
> document existing features (new pbkdf, per keyslot parameters, unbound
> keyslots, metadata auto-recovery capabilities, up-conversion to LUKS2,
> etc.).
> 
> LUKS2 metadata is more flexible due to json (text) format so I guess new
> features will keep comming (one of main reasons we decided to switch to
> LUKS2 in first place) but it should always be 'extension' and not an
> incompatible change.
> 
> Regards O.

Thanks, good to know. I have not really looked at the new format,
but I should find some time in the near future. I will start
on reviewing and extending the FAQ. 

Regards,
Arno

-- 
Arno Wagner,     Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform.,    Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718  FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF  B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718
----
A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt



[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux