Re: Why is the chk_luks_keyslots tool not routinely included?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29/03/2020 14:34, Jordan Glover wrote:
> On Sunday, March 29, 2020 10:20 AM, Arno Wagner <arno@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> I think that is a decision by the distros. I am certainly
>> willing to maintain it for the foreseeable future. It is
>> not really much effort.
> 
> The distros just do "make install" [1]. I think it's upstream who decides what this command does.
> 
> [1] https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/tree/trunk/PKGBUILD?h=packages/cryptsetup#n39

My plan was to include this check in repair command instead of adding additional binary.
(The code could remain basically the same.)

With LUKS2 we can store other data in binary keyslot area (depends on type), so it need a little
bit more work but it should not be a big problem.

Please report an issue for it, that helps to not forget about it.

Thanks,
Milan
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
https://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt



[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux