Thanks for your help, Bob. I have run the keyslot checker, and there appears to be damage. I read in many places that this means the data is simply irrecoverable. But I don't understand how that could be so. Assuming I know my password, couldn't I theoretically brute-force each of these areas where entropy is low? Is it because there are likely to be other areas with low entropy that are not detected by the checker? Would changing the sector size help? Or, is my understanding of hard disks just so bare, that I fail to realize how difficult this would be? If nobody answers, I'll assume it's hopeless, as based on the following output, this is what my inclination is to believe. If someone has a "wild idea" (the possibility of recovering the key from RAM is long gone), then I am certainly willing to try it -- even if it takes a decade or so to unlock. It's a crypto wallet with just enough to pay off my first year of medical school loans... root@pony:/home/m/cryptsetup-master/misc/keyslot_checker# ./chk_luks_keyslots /dev/sdb5 parameters (commandline and LUKS header): sector size: 512 threshold: 0.900000 - processing keyslot 0: start: 0x001000 end: 0x03f800 low entropy at: 0x005000 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x005200 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x005400 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x005600 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x005800 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x005a00 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x005c00 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x005e00 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038000 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038200 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038400 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038600 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038800 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038a00 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038c00 entropy: 0.000000 low entropy at: 0x038e00 entropy: 0.000000 - processing keyslot 1: keyslot not in use - processing keyslot 2: keyslot not in use - processing keyslot 3: keyslot not in use - processing keyslot 4: keyslot not in use - processing keyslot 5: keyslot not in use - processing keyslot 6: keyslot not in use - processing keyslot 7: keyslot not in use An example of one of these points with low entropy, using verbose output: low entropy at: 0x038600 entropy: 0.000000 Binary dump: 0x038600 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038610 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038620 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038630 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038640 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038650 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038660 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038670 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038680 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038690 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0386a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0386b0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0386c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0386d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0386e0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0386f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038700 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038710 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038720 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038730 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038740 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038750 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038760 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038770 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038780 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x038790 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0387a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0387b0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0387c0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0387d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0387e0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ 0x0387f0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ................ On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:34 PM, K Mmmm <1800ponysauce@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hello everyone.. > > About 6 months ago one of my encrypted drives crashed during a brief data > transfer I was doing. Because it was just a transfer, I did not have the > keys backed up for this particular hard drive. I do not have another backup > copy of the data contained in this drive. However it is extremely important > to my livelihood. This listserv is really my last hope. > > Using a platter switch, I was able to copy most of the data to a new hard > disk. Fortunately, there does appear to be a valid version of a LUKS header > still intact. However, the password I was using isn't working. It does use > some special characters, but even the alternates for those characters on > other locales aren't working. I guess I am first wondering if it is possible > the LUKS header has changed somehow? If so, can I use the existing data on > the drive to help me in a keysearch? Surely, some part of this header must > be relevant to me, even if it is different? ... Is it definitely possible > for it to have changed? ... Or could it be something else, e.g. could a > change in blocksize during the platter switch between hard drives have > changed the key? The original hard drive originated from a ~2011 laptop > running Ubuntu 14~. Most of my password guesses were from Ubuntu 16. > > If you would like more information (the actual header, partition layout, > etc.), see this thread: > > https://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2346612 > > I think the partition layout might be relevant, as there is only a 2 space > between the EXT and Linux partitions. > > At this point I am trying to gather as many ideas as possible. If there is > something crazy you've thought of which could be possible, but have never > seen yet, please suggest it and I will most likely try to investigate it. > This data is extremely important for my livelihood. > > Another thread: > http://askubuntu.com/questions/848429/why-cant-i-unlock-an-image-recovery-of-my-encrypted-disk-despite-using-the-cor > > Even something as simple as being able to programatically change locales > without having to log-in and out could help a lot. The update-locale command > does not work without loging in and out... A script like that, or just > something a little less brute-force than brute-force-luks (which I've > tried), would be very useful. > > Currently booting from an Ubuntu 14 live disk. hoping it could be a > locale/OS-version problem since the password did use special characters and > I may have changed the locale to Portuguese/Brazilian... although it's > unlikely. > > Thanks, > Steve _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
