Re: Alignment issue with 4K disk

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There is another (i think) related problem that was reported here[1]

Are these warnings serious or can they be ignored?


[1] https://github.com/mhogomchungu/zuluCrypt/issues/25

On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Yves-Alexis Perez <corsac@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On mar., 2016-01-05 at 00:02 +0100, Sven Eschenberg wrote:
>> Hi Alexis,
>
> (Yves-Alexis actually)
>>
>> I stumbled over this line:
>>
>> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 33553920 bytes
>>
>> The latter resembles 65535 sectors (512 Byte logical ones), which
>> explains why the automated alignment was done at sector 65535. This
>> value seems extremely weird though.
>>
>> You said the drive was external, connected how? USB maybe?
>
> Yes. It's a Samsung T3 disk, so everything is integrated (disk+sata/usb3
> adapter), not much chance I can do anything here.
>
> I'll try to force the alignment to 2048s for part1 and see what happens.
>>
>> Can you take a look at hdparm -I /dev/sdc? Anything unusual there?
>
> I'll try tonight (I don't have it at hand).
>
> Thanks for the pointers though.
> --
> Yves-Alexis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dm-crypt mailing list
> dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
> http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
>
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt



[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux