Is there a reason why other persistent block device naming schemes are not supported? I for one would love to use by-id, "a unique name depending on the hardware serial number": https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Persistent_block_device_naming#by-id_and_by-path
I am aware of the difference addressing hardware and LUKS header, but in my use case, I actually *do* want to address hardware in crypttab at al.
Thanks, and keep up the good work! -- ilf Über 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht weg! -- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes für Tastaturbenutzung
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt