Security concern: gpg keyfile vs passphrase

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi all,

I'm encrypting my whole system under LUKS, and I've seen that in the
wiki of Arch and Gentoo they suggest to use a keyfile and encrypt it
with gpg.

Why is more secure to encrypt a keyfile with a passphrase and then
encrypt the device with the keyfile rather than encrypting the device
directly with the passphrase?

Against a brute force attack the passphrase is the same, so they should
be equally secure, am I wrong?

Thank you


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt

[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux