On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 03:43:53 CET, 0x14@xxxxxxxxx wrote: > >No bad logic so far, I overlooked that you use plain devices > >and that you seem to be after some form of plausible deniablility, > >not after increased security. Sorry. > > Some form of increased security with help of plausible deniability :-p > I assumed it sounds and looks like another snake oil, so I came here > for professional opinion :) > > >So if that is your goal, that would work. But be aware that > >you always have to type the full (long) command in and that > >you must make sure it does not end up on disk (shell history), > >otherwise it becomes obvious the two things are not random. > > Actually, I was writing a bash script to simplify things a bit > before I realize I need to clarify things here :) And I know about > HISTIGNORE and stuff. > > What`s your opinion anyways? You do support some "plausible > deniability" efforts with reservations, as I understood. Actually the other way round. I think plausible deniability is dangerous to the people using it in most situations. I am not going to help with it. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. -- Plato If it's in the news, don't worry about it. The very definition of "news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
