Re: Documentation inconsistency -- On-Disk Format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/21/2014 03:51 AM, Robert Nichols wrote:
> I just noticed that in the LUKS On-Disk Format Specification document 1.2.1
> http://wiki.cryptsetup.googlecode.com/git/LUKS-standard/on-disk-format.pdf
> the LUKS key slots are numbered 1-8, whereas all the tools number them 0-7.

It is just for "historic" reasons. I can fix it in documentation but old
documentation is still in place (it is installed e.g. as docs in various distros).
It could make the problem even worse.

(And changing tools means breaking user scripts which is even worse.)

It is not the first standard which uses pseudo-code description while real
implementation differs in details.

> That makes communication difficult.

I do not think so. When dealing with users problem always the tool output
is important. The slot offsets depends on key size so you must have always
proper luksDump output for the device.

Milan


_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt




[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux