Give it at least a few days before jumping to conclusions. There is a number of possibilities for what happened and what is said on the page actually being true is just one of them. Also note that the claims about valid signatures on the current, crippled binaries are shaky as the keys were apparently changed recently. Arno On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 00:49:01 CEST, Robert Nichols wrote: > Sourceforge page warns against continued use, and the latest release > does not permit creation of new volumes. > > http://arstechnica.com/security/2014/05/truecrypt-is-not-secure-official-sourceforge-page-abruptly-warns/ > > http://truecrypt.sourceforge.net/ > > -- > Bob Nichols "NOSPAM" is really part of my email address. > Do NOT delete it. > > _______________________________________________ > dm-crypt mailing list > dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx > http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- A good decision is based on knowledge and not on numbers. - Plato _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
