Re: benchmark, kernel, libgcrypt, comparisons

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 30.01.2014 01:22, shmick@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> serpent decryption is vastly faster, twofish in general but seems AES isn't
> 
> #  Algorithm | Key |  Encryption |  Decryption
>      aes-cbc   128b   150.2 MiB/s   180.4 MiB/s
>      aes-cbc   256b   117.5 MiB/s   136.0 MiB/s
>      aes-xts   256b   171.3 MiB/s   176.6 MiB/s
>      aes-xts   512b   131.4 MiB/s   134.1 MiB/s

Just to get a little indication of the "smidge" better performance of 
hardware accelerated AES.

This is what i get for AES on Core i7 4770 (a.k.a. Haswell)

#  Algorithm | Key |  Encryption |  Decryption
     aes-cbc   128b   753.2 MiB/s  3305.0 MiB/s
     aes-cbc   256b   551.4 MiB/s  2509.0 MiB/s
     aes-xts   256b  2799.0 MiB/s  2853.0 MiB/s
     aes-xts   512b  2154.0 MiB/s  2162.0 MiB/s





-- 

Matthias
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt




[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux