On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 15:19:33 CET, Robert Nichols wrote: > On 11/22/2013 05:49 AM, shmick@xxxxxxxxxx wrote: [...] > >>Also there are some fixes ready for reencryption tool on the way so you > >>may be also interested waiting for 1.6.3 release in coming weeks. > > > >i shall wait around for some updates > >just finally as an aside, is this method truly safe compared to starting > >again ? > > Safer and simpler just to start over with a luksFormat, as you proposed. It is simpler. As to safer, neither is safe without a good backup. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx GnuPG: ID: CB5D9718 FP: 12D6 C03B 1B30 33BB 13CF B774 E35C 5FA1 CB5D 9718 ---- There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies. The first method is far more difficult. --Tony Hoare _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
