En réponse à Arno Wagner <arno@xxxxxxxxxxx> : > The additional space is not the problem. The problem is > keeping data and additonal data consistent and keeping > head-movements minimal. There is quite a bit of discussion > and literature around about these problems as this gets > proposed time and again. > If I remember correctly, some people even tried with custom > disks that had 540 byte sectors or something like that. All > efforts failed, this idea always dies as soon as practical > filesystem aspects come into play. > Maybe it's off topic, but why we don't put integrity at filesystem level? If we mess something at ciphered level, we could detect it at filesystem level because it's really unlikely that somebody could break the ciphered level *and* keep filesystem integrity. Thanks Envoyé avec Inmano, ma messagerie renversante et gratuite : http://www.inmano.com _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
