Re: FSB saturation?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Nope. :-)

root@yupa:~# dd if=/dev/md1 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=65536
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 10.1625 s, 423 MB/s
root@yupa:~# dd if=/dev/mapper/yupa of=/dev/null bs=64k count=65536
65536+0 records in
65536+0 records out
4294967296 bytes (4.3 GB) copied, 35.2504 s, 122 MB/s


On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Milan Broz <mbroz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 05/14/2011 04:36 PM, Kyle Rose wrote:
>> For the past week I've been trying to figure out why my
>> dm-crypt-on-RAID6 performance is so terrible. To wit:
>>
>> root@yupa:/source# hdparm -t /dev/md1
>>
>> /dev/md1: <---the RAID 6 block device
>> ÂTiming buffered disk reads: 1262 MB in Â3.00 seconds = 420.19 MB/sec
>>
>> root@yupa:/source# hdparm -t /dev/mapper/yupa
>>
>> /dev/mapper/yupa: <---the dm-crypt device with /dev/md1 as the underlying store
>> ÂTiming buffered disk reads: 370 MB in Â3.00 seconds = 123.26 MB/sec
>
> IIRC hdparm is doing direct io of size 2MB.
>
> Can you try do the same but with dd (just dd from device without direct mode).
> like "dd if=/dev/md1 of=/dev/null bs=64k count=4096"
>
> Gives it better throughput now? (on 2.6.38 and above)
>
> Milan
>
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt



[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux