> On 11/16/2010 12:32 PM, Igor Novgorodov wrote: >> Such big difference between read and write speed is by design? >> Or it is a problem of my setup? Maybe i should try to disable >> hyperthreading and check again? > That should be probably improved later. > (btw I just fixed stacking there, it was written by Andi Kleen). Okay, will be waiting for improved versions, thanks. > Anyway, now I need to check that there is no known data corruption > with this approach and then we can add another patches on top of it. > (Targeted for 2.6.38, it missed 2.6.37 merge window already.) > (If anyone see some reproducible data corruption when using this patch, > please let me know.) I've just been testing it on a loopback device with a portion of our maildir, about 50G, 70k files. Copying in/out and comparing MD5 sums showed no evidence of data corruption so far. _______________________________________________ dm-crypt mailing list dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt
