Re: Efficacy of xts over 1TB

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:42:37PM +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote:
> Well....
> 
> I've just read some sections of the Standard... D4 and D6... it rather
> seems that really the whole size (of the partition) is meant,... and not
> just the block size... although they speak of ranges > 100 TB
> 
> 
> *confused now*
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Chris.

I suspect that comes from only 2^128 possible cipher blocks and the
birthday paradox which would give you the same cipher block twice
when having around 2^64 blocks (modelled as random).

Arno
-- 
Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno@xxxxxxxxxxx 
GnuPG:  ID: 1E25338F  FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C  0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F
----
Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans

If it's in the news, don't worry about it.  The very definition of 
"news" is "something that hardly ever happens." -- Bruce Schneier 
_______________________________________________
dm-crypt mailing list
dm-crypt@xxxxxxxx
http://www.saout.de/mailman/listinfo/dm-crypt


[Index of Archives]     [Device Mapper Devel]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux